Politicizing Katchatheevu: PM's Statements Stir Historical Controversy and Diplomatic Tensions

The controversy surrounding Katchatheevu, an islet in the Palk Strait, has recently been reignited by comments from Prime Minister, suggesting a politicization of the issue with implications for India-Sri Lanka relations. PM's statement highlights new facts alleging Congress's careless handling of Katchatheevu's cession to Sri Lanka, stirring a longstanding debate over the islet's ownership and historical claims.

Contextual Background

• Historical Claims: Katchatheevu was part of the zamindari system under the Raja of Ramanathapuram since 1803. Historical references and administrative actions over the years have contributed to a complex narrative surrounding the islet's sovereignty.

• 1974 and 1976 Agreements: These agreements between India and Sri Lanka, settling the maritime boundary and the question of Katchatheevu's ownership, have been a focal point of contention. India acknowledged the islet as part of Sri Lankan territory, a stance reaffirmed by successive Indian governments.

• Political Implications: The BJP, like other parties in Tamil Nadu, has voiced the desire to retrieve Katchatheevu, yet this issue becomes more contentious when discussed by national leadership, impacting diplomatic relations with Sri Lanka.

The Role of Documentation and Statements

• RTI Revelations: Information obtained through RTI suggests that prior to the 1974 and 1976 agreements, Indian authorities recognized a weak claim over Katchatheevu.

• Historical and Legal Perspectives: Documentation from the period and opinions from figures like Jawaharlal Nehru and constitutional expert M.C. Setalvad indicate a nuanced understanding of the islet's legal and historical status.

Analysis of Politicization

• Electoral Considerations: The issue's resurgence, particularly by Prime Minister, suggests a strategic use of historical grievances for electoral gains, raising concerns over the politicization of foreign policy and historical disputes.

• Impact on India-Sri Lanka Relations: Such statements have the potential to complicate diplomatic ties with Sri Lanka, especially when they contradict the official stance of the Indian government and previous agreements acknowledging Sri Lanka's sovereignty over Katchatheevu.

Conclusion

The Katchatheevu dispute underscores the challenges of reconciling historical claims with modern diplomatic realities. While regional political dynamics in Tamil Nadu may drive the narrative around Katchatheevu's retrieval, the implications of national leaders engaging in this discourse extend beyond domestic politics, affecting India's foreign relations and its approach to resolving historical disputes. The issue illustrates the delicate balance between addressing local sentiments and maintaining stable international relations, especially with neighboring countries.

Reason it's important : No man’s land :Those in power should not rake up issues that affect ties with neighbours

Published in : The Hindu

Date appeared in newspaper : 02 April 2024

Link to the article (might require a paid subscription) : https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/2024-04-02/th_international/articleGM8CK79MP-6327508.ece